December 13, 2011 |
Think "climate change"
and the companies that come to mind are oil giants like Exxon Mobil or
BP - not JP Morgan or Bank of America.
But
a new study by Urgewald, a German environmental organization,
establishes a strong link between large multinational banks and the coal
industry, one of the biggest contributors to climate change.
The study
(.pdf), "Bankrolling Climate Change," identifies the top 20 "climate
killer" banks by the amount of financial support they give the coal
industry. Number one is JP Morgan Chase, followed by Citi and Bank of
America. That's despite lofty rhetoric from these companies about their
work to address climate change.
To
learn more about the banks' role in climate change, I spoke with Heffa
Schuecking, the director of Urgewald and the principal author of the new
study. She recently returned from a week at the U.N. climate talks in
Durban, South Africa.
What was the goal of embarking on this study?
Increasingly
over the past few years, banks have begun to do a lot of climate speak.
I'm from Germany, and Deutsche Bank calls itself "climate ambassador."
Many U.S. companies also talk about how they are going carbon neutral in
their own operations and how they want to help the world transition to a
low-carbon economy. So we thought we'd take a real look into the
portfolios of the banks to see if their words and their deeds matched up
to each other.
The other part
of it is that in 2010 we had the highest CO2 emissions since the
beginning of industrialization. And there's a question of who is
financing these emissions? Who is paying for the plants that are causing
these emissions?
How important are banks in getting a coal plant built or a coal mine up and running?
Building
a 600-megawatt coal-fired power plant - a typical size - is going to
cost over $2 billion. That's not money that utilities usually have just
lying around in the corner. Bank financing pays an important role,
either through direct lending or banks organizing capital for utilities
to pursue these projects. The two most important roles of banks are as
providers of corporate loans for the coal industry and as providers of
investment banking services, meaning helping the company to sell shares
or bonds. In terms of our calculations of the amounts of money in the
"climate killer bank" rankings, we didn't differentiate between these
roles. We figured it's secondary whether a bank directly gives its own
money or plays an organizing role: This is support the banks give to the
coal industry.
What sort of sums of money are we talking about here?
We
found $308 billion in coal financing since 2005, the year the Kyoto
Protocol came into force. That includes our analysis of the 40 largest
utilities operating coal-fired power plants and the 30 largest companies
doing coal mining, which amounts to roughly half of the industry. We
also found that since 2005, the annual amount of financing provided by
banks to the coal industry has doubled. That's really worrying.
You
found that the three biggest offenders are JP Morgan, Citi and Bank of
America. What sort of activities are these and other banks specifically
financing?
One of the
worst companies in the mining sector is Coal India. It is the largest
coal mining company in the world in terms of production, and almost
every problem connected with the industry you find in this company. That
includes use of child laborers (which is against the law in India) and
huge environmental problems, including underground coal fires in a
heavily populated area. People are constantly confronted with carbon
monoxide and huge volumes of toxic fumes.
At
the same time, you have Bank of America, Citi, Morgan Stanley and
Deutsche Bank who organized an IPO for Coal India. They helped craft the
prospectus for the IPO, which in 500 pages doesn't mention the word
"environment" or "climate change."
What sort of rhetoric are we hearing from these banks about the environment?
Well,
JP Morgan claims they are helping the world transition to a low-carbon
economy. Citi calls itself on its website the most innovative bank in
climate change. Bank of America calls global climate change the most
formidable challenge we are facing.
Do you have proposals for how you want the banks to change their behavior?
Well,
first, if you look at the overall picture, even the World Bank says
that if all the new coal-fired power plants in the pipeline are built
over the next 25 years, then we're going to emit more CO2 than
everything that has been emitted up till now since the beginning of
industrialization. It's insane. We have to quit coal. It's much more
difficult to quit oil because that involves transforming the transport
system - we're going to need longer for that. But substituting
coal-fired power plants is a much easier thing.
As
for banks, they need to start managing their portfolios and setting
emissions reduction targets for their portfolios. In discussing the
study with banks in Germany, for example, we found bankers actually have
no idea what's in their portfolios. It's like the subprime crisis in
that way - they don't know. They don't measure it. They don't count it.
They don't keep track of it. There is one positive example in the U.S.,
which is the Overseas Private Investment Corporation (OPIC). It's a
public financial institution that in 2008 made a commitment to reduce
greenhouse gas emissions of their portfolio by 50 percent within 15
years. And they've begun implementing that plan.
No comments :
Post a Comment
Please comment about anything concern to your own perspective.