Thursday, June 25, 2009

SPECIAL COMMITTEE ON DECOLONIZATION APPROVES TEXT CALLING ON UNITED STATES TO EXPEDITE SELF-DETERMINATION PROCESS FOR PUERTO RICO

Members Hear Petitioners Speak up for Independence, Statehood, Free Association

Special Committee on Decolonization
GA/COL/3193 - Press Release
New York - June 15, 2009



The Special Committee on Decolonization this afternoon approved a draft resolution calling upon the Government of the United States to expedite a process that would allow the Puerto Rican people to exercise fully their inalienable right to self-determination and independence.

By the terms of that text, which the Special Committee approved by consensus, the decolonization body -– formally known as the Special Committee on the Situation with Regard to the Implementation of the Declaration on the Granting of Independence to Colonial Countries and Peoples -– requested that the President of the United States release all Puerto Rican political prisoners serving sentences for cases relating to the Non-Self-Governing Territory’s struggle for independence -– including two who had been imprisoned for more than 28 years. It expressed serious concern about actions carried out against Puerto Rican independence fighters and encouraged rigorous investigations of those actions, in cooperation with relevant authorities.

The Special Committee, also known as the “Committee of 24”, urged the United States Government to complete the return of occupied land and installations on Vieques island and in Ceiba to the Puerto Rican people; respect their inhabitants’ fundamental human rights to health and economic development; and expedite and cover the costs of decontaminating the areas previously used for military exercises.

Introducing the draft resolution, Cuba’s representative said Puerto Rico was a Latin American and Caribbean country with its own national identity, and its long struggle for independence was deeply rooted in a sense of identity. Notwithstanding 27 resolutions and decisions approved by the Special Committee and the General Assembly, the people of the Commonwealth were still unable to exercise their legitimate right to genuine self-determination and independence due to continuing economic, political and social domination by the United States, the colonial Power.

The Special Committee also heard 32 petitioners present the views of various Puerto Rican groups, parties and organizations. Many reiterated the Special Committee’s request that the General Assembly call on the United States Government to begin a just and equitable process to allow Puerto Ricans to exercise their right to self-determination, in accordance with Assembly resolution 1514 (XV) and the Special Committee’s numerous resolutions and decisions on the matter.

Petitioners also called on the United States Government immediately to suspend the death penalty in Puerto Rico, which was prohibited by the Commonwealth’s Constitution. They raised concerns about racial discrimination and economic exploitation, disproportionate prison sentences handed down to Puerto Rican independence fighters in United States jails, the supremacy of United States federal law over local legislation, and the environmental damage caused by the United States industries and nuclear testing on Puerto Rican islands.

Fernando Martin, Executive President of the Puerto Rican Independence Party, said it was particularly important that the General Assembly consider the question of Puerto Rico, since 2010 would mark the end of the Second International Decade for the Eradication of Colonialism, as well as more than 200 years of emancipation and independence in the rest of Latin America. The Assembly’s consideration of the issue would exert moral and legal pressure on the United States Government to stop using pretexts and excuses to avoid complying with its decolonization obligations under international law.

But while some petitioners advocated independence, others were in favour of statehood. Jose Adames of the Literacy Center Anacona, said more than 95 per cent of Puerto Rico’s population had consistently voted either for direct statehood, as the fifty-first state of the Union or in a free association arrangement with the United States. Anthony Mele, Chairman of the Sixty-fifth Infantry Regiment Honour Task Force, said Puerto Ricans enjoyed citizenship and equal protection under the United States Bill of Rights. However, the sovereign rights of those 4 million people to vote in national elections were obstructed by arcane legislation that the United States Congress could amend easily. It was a national disgrace that Puerto Rican soldiers fought and died in wars under the United States flag, but were unable to vote for representatives in Congress. Statehood for Puerto Rico was a right, and the Special Committee must call on the United States Government to grant it.

Hector Ferrer of the Popular Democratic Party, however, favoured enhanced Commonwealth status, which would be non-territorial and non-colonial. Despite President Barack Obama’s commitment to resolving the case of Puerto Rico and guaranteeing a voice for the Commonwealth in discussions on its status, Congress had recently passed a bill which contravened that commitment. Two rounds of voting proposed in the bill was intended to manipulate the results in favour of statehood and did not provide for the commonwealth option. A constitutional assembly on status would be the best mechanism for determining Puerto Rico’s future.

Other petitioners addressing the Special Committee were representatives of the following organizations: Colegio de Abogados de Puerto Rico; People’s Law Office (on behalf of the National Lawyers Guild International Committee); American Association of Jurists; El Partido Nacionalista de Puerto Rico; Movimiento Liberador; PROELA; Puertorriquenos Unidos en Accion; Movimiento Independentista Nacional Hostosiano de Puerto Rico; Comite Puerto Rico en la ONU; Frente Autonomista; Coalicion Puertorriquena contra la Pena de Muerte; El Comite de Derechos Humanos de Puerto Rico; Colectivo de Trabajo por la Independencia de Puerto Rico Area de Mayaguez; Soho Art Festival; Socialist Workers Party; National Advancement for Puerto Rican Culture; Alianza por Libre Asociacion Soberana; Frente Patriotico Arecibeno; Primavida Inc.; Accion Democratica Puertorriquena; DC-6; Colectivo Puertorriqueno Pro Independencia; Hostos Grand Jury Resistance Campaign; Ministerio Latino; Movimiento de Afirmacion Viequense; Committee for the Rescue and Development of Vieques; Frente Socialista de Puerto Rico; and Comite Familiares y Amigos Avelino Gonzalez Claudio.

Members of delegations speaking today were the representatives of Dominica (on behalf of the Non-Aligned Movement), Nicaragua, Panama, Ecuador, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, Venezuela, Bolivia, Syria and Iran.

The Special Committee will meet again at 10 a.m. tomorrow, Tuesday, 16 June, to consider the questions of New Caledonia and Western Sahara.

Background

The Special Committee on the Situation with Regard to the Implementation of the Declaration on the Granting of Independence to Colonial Countries and Peoples met this morning to hear petitioners from Puerto Rico.

Committee members had before them a report prepared by the Rapporteur (document A/AC.109/2009/L.13), which notes that, under the current arrangements, authority over Puerto Rico’s defence, international relations, external trade and monetary matters remains with the United States, while the Commonwealth has autonomy over taxes, social policies and most local affairs. While eligible for United States citizenship, people born in Puerto Rico do not have the right to vote in that country unless they reside on the mainland. In addition, the Commonwealth’s Supreme Court has recognized the existence of Puerto Rican citizenship in a court decision subsequently certified by the island’s Department of State.

Read more here.

PIP ve cerca caso de Puerto Rico en asamblea general ONU

PIP ve cerca caso de Puerto Rico en asamblea general ONU

José Fernández Colón/Prensa Asociada
San Juan, Puerto Rico - 14 de junio de 2009

El Partido Independentista Puertorriqueño (PIP) trabajará para que la Asamblea General de la Organización de Naciones Unidas (ONU) vea el caso de Puerto Rico el año próximo, fecha que fijó ese organismo mundial para la erradicación del colonialismo en el planeta.

El presidente ejecutivo del PIP, Fernando Martín, dijo hoy, sábado, que espera que nuevamente sea aprobada la resolución del Comité de Descolonización, que sesiona el lunes en la sede de la ONU, a los efectos de que Puerto Rico ejercite su derecho de autodeterminación e independencia.

"Ahora la gran tarea es que los países que simpatizan con nuestra causa empujen en la ONU para que el caso se vea en la Asamblea General. Nuestra esperanza es que sea en el 2010, año en que se cumple el segundo decenio que declaró la Asamblea General para la erradicación de coloniaje, y el 2010 es el bicentenario del comienzo de independencia en América Latina", expresó Martín.

El dirigente del PIP dijo en entrevista con Prensa Asociada que espera que la resolución de este año sea aprobada nuevamente por unanimidad y que exhortará a los países latinoamericanos a que hagan fuerza para que el caso de Puerto Rico llegue a la Asamblea General el año entrante.

"El año pasado, no solamente la resolución tuvo apoyo unánime, sino que una vez más se insistió en la solicitud de que la Asamblea General examine el caso de Puerto Rico, cosa que no hecho desde 1953. Además, fue significativo por la presencia en sala de un número de delegaciones de países latinoamericanos no miembros del Comité expresándose en solidaridad con la resolución", indicó.

Panamá, Ecuador, Guatemala, Honduras y Nicaragua fueron los países no miembros del Comité de Descolonización que se expresaron solidarios con la resolución.

La resolución aprobada en el 2008, que se espera también se apruebe este año, reafirma principios como la "afirmación inequívoca a la aplicabilidad de la Resolución 151415, el derecho inalienable del pueblo de Puerto Rico a su autodeterminación e independencia".

A la vez, se insta a los Estados Unidos a que cree las condiciones propicias para que el pueblo puertorriqueño decida sobre su estatus, al igual que hay una referencia para el gobierno estadounidense libere a los presos políticos puertorriqueños.

Aunque no descarta que el sector anexionista intente sabotear la aprobación de la resolución bajo el argumento de que hay un proyecto radicado en el Congreso estadounidense por el comisionado residente Pedro Pierluisi para un proceso de definición de estatus, ve poco probable que eso suceda.

Según el profesor de derecho, el lunes la resolución va a ser presentada nuevamente por la delegación de Cuba, como lo ha sido tradicionalmente, aunque en 1991 el promotor de la misma fue Venezuela.

Sobre México y República Dominicana, que no forman parte del Comité de Descolonización y que el año pasado no hicieron expresiones de apoyo a la resolución, Martín dijo que espera que lo hagan cuando el asunto llegue a la Asamblea General o durante las reuniones preparatorias para "empujar el caso de Puerto Rico" al pleno de la ONU.
PIP foresees UN assembly will see island's case

José Fernandez Colón/Associated Press
June 14, 2009

The Puerto Rico Independence Party is working so that the General Assembly of the United Nations reviews Puerto Rico’s case next year, when the international organization has aimed to put an end to colonialism on the planet

Fernando Martín, executive president of the PIP, said Saturday he expects fat a resolution by the decolonization committee is approved again during a meeting on Monday at the UN's headquarters in New York allowing Puerto Rico to exercise its right to self-determination and independence.

"The great task now is that countries that empathize with our cause push the UN so the case is seen before the General Assembly. Our hope is that [we achieve this] in 2010, the year that marks the second decade since the General Assembly declared it would eradicate colonialism, and the bi-centennial anniversary of the start of independence in Latin America," said Martin.

The independence movement leader expects the unanimous approval of the resolution this year and will urge the Latin American countries to put pressure so that Puerto Rico’s case reaches the General Assembly next year.

"Last year, not only did the resolution gain unanimous approval but it was insisted again on the request that the General Assembly examine the ease of Puerto Rico, something that it has not done since 1953. In addition, it was significant [because of] the presence in the room of a number of delegations of non-committee member Latin American countries expressing solidarity with the resolution”, he said.

Panamá, Ecuador, Guatemala, Honduras and Nicargaua were the non-committee members that expressed solidarity with the resolution.

The resolution approved in 2008, which is also expected to be approved this year, reaffirms principles such as "the unequivocal affirmation to the applicability of Resolution 1514XV, the inalienable right of the people of Puerto Rico to its self-determination and independence”.

At the same time, it urges the United States to create the proper conditions so that the Puerto Rican people can decide on its status and for the US government to release Puerto Rican political prisoners.

Although he does not reject that the annexionist sector will try to sabotage the approval of the resolution based on the argument that there has been a bill filed in Congress by Resident Commissioner Pedro Pierluisi for a process to define status, he sees little possibility in that happening.

The resolution will be presented again on Monday by the Cuban delegation, which has done so in the past, even though in 1991 it was Venezuela that promoted it, said Martin, a law professor.

Regarding Mexico arid the Dominican Republic — which are not part of the decolonization committee and which last year did not express support to the resolution — Martin said he expects the countries to support when the issue reaches the General Assembly or during preparatory meetings to “push Puerto Rico's case" at the UN's floor.

Friday, June 12, 2009

Cucaracha En Jamonilla Tulip Era Plan Para Mejorarle El Sabor

San Juan, Puerto Rico - Luego de que se diseminara la noticia de que el jueves pasado una consumidora halló una cucaracha entera en una lata de Jamonilla Tulip, su casa manufacturadora admitió que esto se trataba de un plan secerto para "mejorarle el sabor y la textura a este producto".

"Se supone que fuera una sorpresa, pero nos la arruinaron", lamentó Manuel Méndez, el encargado de mercadear la mercancía de la compañía que manufactura el alimento. "Por años la gente se nos ha quejado de la Jamonilla Tulip: que si no sabe a na', que si ni el perro de casa se la come, que si es solamente 'comida de huracán'... así que me dije, '¿ah sí?'. Acto seguido empecé a hablar con nuestros científicos de alimentos a ver cuál sería una forma económica y efectiva de añadirle sabor y textura al producto, y llegamos a la conclusión que si dejábamos los potes abiertos en el almacén, se le meterían cucarachas, las cuales podríamos luego atrapar en las latas para preservar su sabor... ¡y en realidad no fue fácil, porque muchas veces ni las mismas cucarachas se querían comer la dichosa jamonilla!".



El nuevo producto será próximamente enlatado en recipientes que destaquen las virtudes del nuevo "ingrediente secreto", con frases excitantes tales como: "¡Nuevo sabor!", "¡Ahora con más proteínas y minerales!" y "¡Más crujiente!". Sin embargo, la compañía distribuidora de la Jamonilla Tulip no sabe si ahora que la gente sabe cuál es su "ingrediente secreto", el plan de "reinventarse la jamonilla" será tan exitoso como lo hubiera sido de otro modo: "La realidad es que no debimos haber dejado una cucaracha entera ahí encima de la jamonilla: ésa fue mala nuestra, y me disculpo por eso.. ¡debimos haberla triturado y haberla mezclado más en la jamonilla, y así nadie se hubiera enterado! Pero pues, se vive y se aprende... ¡será para la próxima!", aseguró espeluznantemente.



Por su parte, muchos antiguos consumidores del alimento confirmaron las sospechas de la casa manufacturadora: "Yo no voy a poder comerme un sangüichito de mezcla sin tener esa imagen mental de la cucaracha sobre la jamonilla: ¡qué asco!", juró con cara de disgusto María Jiménez, una ama de casa que antes solía comprar ese producto a menudo. "O sea, yo prefiero mil veces comer en sitios como McDonald's y restaurantes chinos, donde tú sabes que hay cucarachas y ratones por to's la'os en la cocina, ¡pero al menos no los ves! Ojos que no ven, estómago que no siente náuseas". Aparte de los consumidores, otro personaje atribulado por todo este asunto es la latita parlanchina de la Jamonilla Tulip (la que en los anuncios ochentosos se la pasaba exclamando: "¡Tulip! ¡Tulip!"), quien aseguró: "¡A mí me repugnan las cucarachas! ¡No quiero ni imaginarme cuántos de esos malditos insectos albergué en mis adentros! Bueno, ahora si me disculpan, tengo que irme a pegarme un tiro".